History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merchandise Presentation, Inc. v. Blumenfeld
52 N.Y.2d 867
NY
1981
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. *868It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have constituted an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchsberg.

Case Details

Case Name: Merchandise Presentation, Inc. v. Blumenfeld
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 15, 1981
Citation: 52 N.Y.2d 867
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.