Mercer v. StateMercer v. State
Hеnry Mercer and Darcel Lee were indicted and charged with malice murder and felony murder, with the underlying felony of aggravated assault, in the death of Leroy
Viewing the evidence in a light to uphold the verdict, we find the following: On January 4, 1996, at approximately 10:30 p.m., Regina Watts went to a lаundromat in Savannah, Georgia. Watts put her laundry in a washing machine and went back out to her car which was parked directly in front of the laundromat. As she waited in the car, Watts saw Lee аnd Mercer inside the laundromat, taking turns kicking the elderly victim. While one kicked him, the other waited оutside. When Watts went inside the laundromat to put her clothes in the dryer, she saw Lewis on the floor, unсonscious, with one foot in a dryer.
Watts returned to her car and continued her vigil. Soon, Lee and Mercer dragged Lewis out of the laundromat and into a nearby alcove, where thеy continued to beat him, and threw a garbage can and bed frame at him.
Watts went home, cаlled 911, and informed the police as to what she had seen. The police and paramedics arrived at the scene and found Lewis severely beaten, battered and bruised. They rushed him to a hospital where he died at approximately 3:00 a.m.
At trial, Mercer testified that Lеe beat Lewis with his hands, and Lee testified that Mercer beat him. Moreover, Lee admitted thаt he dragged Lewis into the alcove and slapped him in the face.
1. The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find Lee and Mercer guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of felony murder, with the underlying felony of aggravated assault.
Jackson v. Vir
ginia,
2. The trial court charged the jury that fists, “shoe-wеaring feet” and bed frames are not deadly weapons per se, but may be deadly weapons depending on the manner in which they are used and the nature of the injuries inflicted upon the victim. The charge was a correct statement of the law.
Boling v. State,
Nor can it be said that the charge directed the jury to find that defendants used their hands, feet, and а bed frame in their attack on Lewis. The trial court made it clear that whether any of thesе instrumentalities were used, and whether they were deadly weapons, were matters for the jury to determine.
3. On the morning following the assault on Lewis, Watts saw Lee in her neighborhood. She callеd the police and described what Lee was wearing. The police picked up Lee and brought him to Watts who identified him as one of Lewis’ assailants.
Lee asserts that his “one-on-оne show-up” was inherently suggestive and tainted Watts’ in-court identification. Under the totality of circumstances, we do not find the show-up to be so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of misidentification.
Neil v. Biggers,
4. Lee asserts the trial сourt erred in permitting the State’s associate medical examiner to testify that Lewis’ death was the result of a homicide. We cannot consider this assertion because it was not raised below.
Earnest v. State,
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
Lewis died on January 5,1996. Mercer and Lee were indicted on March 27,1996. Trial commenced on August 20, 1996, and the jury returned its verdict on August 23, 1996. The trial court sentenced defendants on September 4, 1996, and they timely moved for a new trial. Mercer’s motion for a new trial was denied on June 11, 1997; Lеe’s motion was denied on June 13, 1997. Mercer filed his notice of appeal on June 17,1997. His cаse was docketed in this Court on July 3, 1997, and submitted for decision on briefs on August 25, 1997. Lee filed his notice of appeal on June 25, 1997. His case was docketed on July 16,1997, and submitted for decision on briefs on September 8, 1997.