Mercaldo v. NavarroMercaldo v. Navarro
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the nonparty appellants’ contentions, Deborah Navarro (hereinafter Navarro) was a necessary party to the foreclosure action by virtue of her cotenancy ownership interest in the property being foreclosed upon (see Capital Resources Co. v Prewitt, 266 AD2d 176 [1999]). The Supreme Court did not err in exercising its inherent powers of equity to grant Navarro leave to intervene, in effect, vacate the default judgment obtained against Navarro‘s ex-husband, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale, revoke the public sale, and set aside the referee‘s deed (see Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 47 NY2d 515, 520-521 [1979]; Alkaifi v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, 24 AD3d 476, 477 [2005]; Fleet Fin. v Gillerson, 277 AD2d 279 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur. [See 15 Misc 3d 1135(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50981(U).]