History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mengore v. State
718 So. 2d 368
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1998
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant Michael David Mengore appeals a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. His motion was properly verified, but the factual allegations in his memorandum of law contained a defective verification clause in which he said that the statements were “true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.” See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Hahn v. Frederick, 66 So.2d 823 (Fla.1953).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to timely resubmit the motion and memorandum with a proper oath.

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mengore v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 1, 1998
Citation: 718 So. 2d 368
Docket Number: No. 98-2934
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.