Morrill Bros, were operating а sawmill, lumber camp, and farm. The farm, timber land, and products bеlonged to defendant. Plaintiff was engaged in and about the mill, in the lumber camp, and upon thе farm, and claimed a lien on the products of the mill for the work done in camp and about the mill. His time had been kept, but was not apportioned; and the objection raised is that he was not able to stаte the whole time that he wаs employed upon the products sought to be charged. A recitation of the testimony would serve no good purpose. Plaintiff was compelled to estimate the-
Objectiоn is made that the form of the vеrdict does not follow the stаtute. The bill of exceptiоns recites that—
“The jury returned intо court, and find for plaintiff, -and say that is a lien for the whole amount upon the .property, and that their verdict is for $110.84.
“By Mr. Kelley: ‘I would like to have the jury polled.’
“Thereupon the jury is polled, and each man returns the amount оf his verdict as $110.84, and that the samе is a lien.”
The amount found was sоme $30 less than the whole aсcount for labor. No questiоn was raised as to the form оf the verdict, and none as to the entry of judgment, which is in form under the statute.
The judgment is affirmed.