History
  • No items yet
midpage
Menechino v. Division of Parole
309 N.Y.S.2d 585
NY
1970
Check Treatment

*838Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, on the sole ground that the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLB article 78 was barred by the four-months period of limitation prescribed (CPLB 217). The court did not reach or consider the petitioner’s argument that he had a constitutional right to be represented by counsel in a parole revocation proceeding. Our determination is, however, without prejudice to any other proceeding which the petitioner may be advised to institute.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Case Details

Case Name: Menechino v. Division of Parole
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 26, 1970
Citation: 309 N.Y.S.2d 585
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.