History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mendenhall v. Cagle
12 Okla. 4
Okla.
1902
Check Treatment

This is an action for mandatory injunction. The facts in this case are the same as those in the case of Andehson v. Ferguson, decided at this sitting of this court, and for the reasons given in that case, this will be reversed, and a new trial granted; and the lower court is *Page 5 directed to proceed in conformity with the views expressed in the case of Anderson v. Ferguson, supra. Costs taxed to the appellee. It is further ordered that the parties be placed in the same occupancy of the land that they were in at the time of the commencement of this action, and to so remain until the further order of the district court, or the judge thereof; but this order is not intended to preclude the parties or either of them from pursuing any other remedy which either may have in any of the courts of the territory.

Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Irwin, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Mendenhall v. Cagle
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Jul 17, 1902
Citation: 12 Okla. 4
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.