held that if the property was the petitioner’s, an attachment was not the proper process to obtain it by; and whether the attachment was properly dissolved or not, was therefore immaterial to his rights, and could not preclude his testing them in replevin.
Writ denied.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
