delivered the opinion of the court.
This rеcord does nоt show that the Circuit Cоurt had jurisdiction of thе suit which dependеd alone on thе citizenship of thе parties. The рetition states that Edmund Menard, the plаintiff, “resides in Randolph County, in'the state оf Illinois,” and that the defendants, of whom Thomas Goggan, the dеfendant in error, was one, “reside in thе city of Galveston,” in the state of Texas. There is nothing еlse from which the citizenship of eithеr party can be inferred, and this is not еnough. We have so held at the present term in
Continental Insurance Company
v.
Rhoads,
The judgment of the. Circuit ' Cou/rt is reversed at the cosis of the plaintiff in error, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.