History
  • No items yet
midpage
Melvin v. State
54 S.E. 686
Ga.
1906
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict; and no error of law being complained of, there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Melvin v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 2, 1906
Citation: 54 S.E. 686
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.