Melvin v. Melvin
73 N.H. 602
N.H.
1904
Check Treatment

Whether sufficient cause appears in any case to require that an action should be brought forward and the judgment vacated, is a question of fact. *Page 603

The evidentiary facts stated are not necessarily inconsistent with a finding that justice did not require such action in this case; consequently the dismissal of the motion presents no error of law. Fulton Pulley Co. v. Company, 71 N.H. 384; Reed v. Prescott, 70 N.H. 88; Clough v. Moore,63 N.H. 111, 113; Warner Bank v. Clement, 58 N.H. 533.

Exception overruled.

YOUNG, J., did not sit: the others concurred.