231 Mass. 399 | Mass. | 1918
This is an appeal from the decree of the Industrial Accident Board refusing to allow to the appellant compensation for legal services, alleged to have been rendered in opposing the petition of the insurer to that board to reopen the John Mellon case, because the agreement of compensation “was signed by mistake” and in opposition to a petition of the insurer to vacate a decree of the Superior Court entered upon the filing of the agreement therein. St. 1911, c. 751, Part III, § 11, as amended by St. 1912, c. 571, § 14.
The appellant was appointed administrator upon the estate of John Mellon, the employee, deceased. The beneficiaries entitled to compensation lived in Scotland. The insurer agreed to and insisted upon the appointment of an administrator. The record does not disclose the next of kin or whether or not the deceased left estate to be administered. The appellant has been paid for legal services connected with his appointment and for his services as administrator. The questions presented are, whether the appointment of the administrator is shown by the record to have been “not otherwise necessary” and whether,
Section 13, amended as above referred to, reads as follows: “The compensation payable under this act in case of the death of the injured employee shall be paid to his legal representative; or, if he has no legal representative, to his dependents; or, if he leaves no dependents, to the persons to whom payment of the expenses for the last sickness and burial are due. If the payment is made to the legal representative of the deceased employee, it shall be paid by him to the dependents or other persons entitled thereto under this act. When the appointment of a legal representative of a deceased employee, not otherwise necessary, is required for carrying out the provisions of this act, the association shall furnish or pay for all legal services rendered in connection with the appointment of such legal representative, or in connection with any of his duties, and shall pay the necessary disbursements for such appointment, the necessary expenses of such legal representative, and reasonable compensation to him for time necessarily spent in carrying out said provisions. All said payments shall be in addition to all sums paid for compensation.”
There is nothing in the statements that the insurer would not pay money to the beneficiaries in Scotland, and that the insurer insisted on getting an administrator appointed, inconsistent with the existence of an estate of greater or less value which remained to be administered upon the death of the employee. This is all the record discloses, and manifestly is not- sufficient to bring the appointment of the appellant administrator within the terms of the above act. If a legal representative was appointed to administer property left by the deceased employee, the insurer would not be held to reimburse that person for money paid for legal services rendered him in the recovery of the compensation which, under the statute, is to be paid by him to dependents or other persons entitled thereto.
Decree affirmed.
