History
  • No items yet
midpage
Melick v. Melick
393 So. 2d 1186
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1981
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The trial judge, on motion for rehearing, refused to consider Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), which was decided the day after final judgment in this case was rendered. Disposition of a case on appeal, however, must be founded on the law in effect when the appellate court reached its decision rather than the law in effect at the time the lower court reached its decision. Hendeles v. Sanford Auto Auction, Inc., 364 So.2d 467 (Fla.1978); Perez v. Perez, 383 So.2d 252 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980). Without suggesting that his rulings on the merits were correct or incorrect, we remand to the trial judge for consideration of the issues in light of the principles set forth in Canakaris v. Canakaris, supra.

REMANDED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Melick v. Melick
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 13, 1981
Citation: 393 So. 2d 1186
Docket Number: No. VV-167
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.