Meisel v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood, NJMeisel v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood, NJ
This motion is by defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, under
The action is against several defendants, the complaint alleging as against the movant a violation of two sections of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, namely, Sections 7(c) and 10(b),
The narrow point raised by the motion is whether punitive damages may be recovered by a plaintiff in an action based on a violation of the Act. It seems clear that the answer is negative, since the Act expressly provides in Section 28,
Motion granted. Technically the matter to be struck is more properly classified as “impertinent”, which term includes matters irrelevant to the issues and which are not properly in issue between the parties (2 Moore’s Federal Practice, pp. 2312-13); in any event, this should not prevent granting the relief sought.
In paragraph “33” of the amended complaint, the words “punitive damages in the amount of $30,000.00, together with” are ordered stricken.
*470 In paragraph "(g)” of the prayer for relief, the letter “s” in the word “defendants” and the words “Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated and” and “respectively” are ordered stricken.
So ordered.