History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meerholz v. Sessions
9 Cal. 277
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

The statement embodied in the record was filed on the motion for a new trial, and we can only examine the action of the Court *278below in denying the motion. As the order was entered by consent, we cannot hear any objection to it on appeal.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent, damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Meerholz v. Sessions
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 9 Cal. 277
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.