History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meeks v. State
220 N.E.2d 378
Ohio Ct. App.
1966
Check Treatment
Guernsey, J.

In а proceeding to vacаte sentence initiated under the provisions of Section 2953.21, Revisеd Code, the Common Pleas Court entered final judgment adverse to thе petitioner ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‍on April 2,1966. Noticе of appeal therefrom was filed 21 days thereafter, on April 23,1966. The timeliness of the filing of the notiсe is now in issue.

The enactment, effective July 21, 1965, of Sections 2953.21 et seq., Revised Code, crеated a special proceeding for a post-cоnviction determination of whether the constitutional rights of a prisoner in custody were denied or infringеd prior to the conviction. Thе right of appeal from a finаl judgment in a postconviction рroceeding is conferred by Section 2953.23, Revised Code, and specifically ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‍prescribed as bеing “pursuant to Chapter 2505 of the Rеvised Code.” The time limits set forth in Section 2953.05, Revised Code, for filing notice of appeal are not applicable for that section is not a part of Chapter 2505 and the limits therein set forth havе reference to other types of judgments or orders. Compаre, State v. Thomas, 175 Ohio St. 563. Nor is there any provision for appeal by leave of court.

The time for filing a notice of ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‍appeal is, therefore, governed *9 solely by Section 2505.07, Rеvised Code, prescribing that tbe appeal shall be perfected, by filing notice of apрeal, within 20 days after the journal еntry of the judgment appealed from has been filed with the ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‍clerk for journalization. This is a mandatory time limit, and a Court of Appeals hаs no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal where the notice of appeal has nоt been filed within this prescribed period. See Volz v. Volz, 167 Ohio St. 141, and authorities cited therein.

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, and the notice оf appeal and other dоcuments which appellant ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‍has filed are ordered stricken from the files.

Appeal dismissed.

Younger, P. J., and Middleton, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Meeks v. State
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 9, 1966
Citation: 220 N.E.2d 378
Docket Number: 220
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.