History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meeks v. Atkeson
277 N.C. 250
N.C.
1970
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There being plenary evidence of defendant’s negligence, the crucial question was whether the evidence established that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. The opinion of Judge Parker, for the Court of Appeals, reviews plaintiff’s evidence and states the applicable legal principles. Repetition is unnecessary. After further consideration, we agree that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, required that the issue of contributory negligence be submitted to the jury. Hence, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Meeks v. Atkeson
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 14, 1970
Citation: 277 N.C. 250
Docket Number: No. 19
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.