History
  • No items yet
midpage
Medina v. State
633 So. 2d 578
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions. We also affirm his sentences for same except as to restitution.

The trial court imposed restitution upon appellant pursuant to section 775.089, Florida Statutes (1991). However, there was no hearing on the matter, nor did the trial court mention restitution in its oral pronouncement of sentence. The parties agree that a hearing must be conducted before restitution may be imposed. Williams v. State, 588 So.2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also Snell v. State, 502 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 509 So.2d 1119 (Fla.1987). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of restitution and remand for a restitution hearing.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Medina v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 30, 1994
Citation: 633 So. 2d 578
Docket Number: No. 92-2298
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.