411 So. 2d 323 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1982
Appellant entered a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement wherein the State agreed, with the trial court’s approval, that “the maximum period of incarceration that [appellant] would face would be one year under the agreement.” Subsequently, appellant was given a true split sentence as authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1981), committing him to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a term of three years, but providing that, after serving one year in prison, the imposition of the remainder of the sentence imposed be stayed and withheld and appellant be placed on probation for a period of two years. Appellant directly appeals from the sentence, arguing that the sentence imposed violates the plea agreement.
Appellant made no objection at the time of the imposition of sentencing, nor has he made a motion to reduce the sentence on the ground that it violated the plea agreement
AFFIRMED.
. See, for example, Orr v. State, 402 So.2d 535 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), where such a motion was made.