Case Information
*1 Case 2:05-cv-02514-JAT Document 24 Filed 05/25/07 Page 1 of 2 WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA George Medina, ) No. CV 05-2514-PHX-JAT
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, ORDER vs.
Judy Friego, et al.,
Respondents.
Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) (Doc. #1). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. #23) recommending that the Petition be denied.
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ( en banc ) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made , but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone , 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #23) is ACCEPTED ;
*2 Case 2:05-cv-02514-JAT Document 24 Filed 05/25/07 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1) is DENIED ; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this 25 th day of May, 2007. - 2 -
