History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meddin v. Karsman
41 Ga. App. 282
Ga. Ct. App.
1930
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

1. One riding by invitation and gratuitously in another’s automobile can not recover for injury caused by the owner’s negligence in driving, unless it amounted to gross negligence. Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga. App. 399 (106 S. E. 297), and citations; Peavy v. Peavy, 36 Ga. App. 202 (136 S. E. 96).

2. “Gross neglect is the want of that care which every man of common sense, how inattentive soever he may be, takes of his own property.” Civil Code (1910), § 3473.

3. The petition in the instant case alleged that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the gross negligence of the defendant in and while operating his automobile in which the petitioner was riding as an invited guest, and this court can not hold as a matter of law that the averments of gross negligence were not supported by the facts stated in the petition. It follows that the court did not err in overruling the general demurrer. The facts stated in the petition distinguish this case from the Peavy case and the other cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Eloodworth, JJ., concur. Connerat & Hunter, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Cherlcas, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Meddin v. Karsman
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 5, 1930
Citation: 41 Ga. App. 282
Docket Number: 20200
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.