History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mechanics' & Traders' Insurance v. Smith
79 Miss. 142
Miss.
1901
Check Treatment
Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A week after the fire, with full knowledge by the insurance company, through its special agent and adjuster, Mr. Alexander, of the existence of the mortgage, it received, through its local agent, Mr. Russell, the premium on the policy, and held it. This fact carries the whole case shown by the record for the assignee of the insured, because it was a waiver of its defenses. See the concluding paragraph of the opinion in Assurance Co. v. Phelps, 77 Miss., 660 (27 So., 745). And see Mitchell v. Insurance Co., 72 Miss., 53 (18 So., 86); Insurance Co. v. Freeman, 19 Tex. Civ. App., 632 (47 S. W., 1025); American Fire Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg, 73 Miss., 470 (18 So., 931). Tender of this premium back after trial commenced is too late.

We are ready to decide the other questions presented, but it is unnecessary to do so.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mechanics' & Traders' Insurance v. Smith
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1901
Citation: 79 Miss. 142
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.