96 Iowa 694 | Iowa | 1896
I. The plaintiffs had no written authority to sell the defendant’s farm. They claim that, being engaged in the real-estate business, the defendant verbally requested them to make a sale of
Y. It is said that there was no such diligence to discover the evidence as would authorize a new triaL The showing, as we view it, was full and satisfactory.
The order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial is affirmed.