History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meagher v. Hayes
152 Mass. 228
Mass.
1890
Check Treatment
W. Allen, J.

The building put upon the land by the consent of the mortgagor, and without the consent of the mortgagee, was clearly, as regards him and the mortgagee, a part of the *230realty, and covered by tbe mortgage. Butler v. Page, 7 Met. 40. Cole v. Stewart, 11 Cusb. 181. Guernsey v. Wilson, 134 Mass. 482. The foreclosure of the mortgage was by sale, and the right of the mortgagee to sell the building as part of the mortgaged property could not be affected by agreements in regard to it to which he was not a party, nor by notice of the claims of the defendants given to one who buys the house at the sale. Clary v. Owen, 15 Gray, 522. Hunt v. Bay State Iron Co. 97 Mass. 279. Southbridge Savings Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542. Decree affirmed.

Memorandum.

On the seventeenth day of September, 1890, James M. MorTON, Esquire, of Fall River, was appointed a Justice of this court in place of Mr. Justice Field, appointed Chief Justice, and tool his seat upon the bench on the twenty-third day of the same month, at the term of this court then held at Boston for the county of Suffolk.

Case Details

Case Name: Meagher v. Hayes
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 5, 1890
Citation: 152 Mass. 228
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.