Meader Atlas Co. v. Buhl
143 A. 536 | N.J. | 1927
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.