History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meade Bomar v. Mahlon Bart.
1 Tex. Civ. App. 342
Tex. App.
1892
Check Treatment

This writ of error is a companion case to H. T. Buse v. Mahlon Bartlett et al., No. 16, this day decided by us. The other section of land mentioned in the conclusions of fact in that case is the subject of controversy in this suit. In this case the possession of the land in controversy was continued in plaintiffs in error up to the institution of the suit and the trial in the court below. In other respects the facts disclosed by the record in this, so far as they are important to the issues determined, are identical with those in said cause No. 16, and the conclusions of law and fact filed in that case are here referred to and adopted as our conclusions of law and fact in this case.

The judgment of the court below will therefore be reversed and judgment will be here rendered for plaintiffs in error.

Reversed and rendered.

A motion for rehearing was overruled. *Page 343

Case Details

Case Name: Meade Bomar v. Mahlon Bart.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 15, 1892
Citation: 1 Tex. Civ. App. 342
Docket Number: No. 95.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.