History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mead v. White
6 Sadler 38
Pa.
1887
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

It may be conceded that the written memoranda were not ad*42missible as entries made in the course of business in a book of original entries, yet it is well settled that a witness may use a paper containing a list of items to refresh his memory, when be knows the entry to have been correct when he made it. Tbe alleged settlement having been attacked, it was clearly admissible to prove tbe several items which preceded it, and were claimed to have been considered and included in the settlement.

We see no error in the rulings relating to the admission of evidence, nor in the charge of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mead v. White
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 28, 1887
Citation: 6 Sadler 38
Docket Number: No. 268, E. D.
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.