Mead v. Mead
131 Mich. 309
Mich.
1902
Check Treatment
Hooker, C. J.

We are of the opinion that the decree of the learned circuit judge, dismissing the complainant’s bill, was justified by the testimony, and should not be dis-' turbed. As the case involves no disputed question of law, it is unnecessary to say more.

The decree is affirmed.

Moore, Grant, and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.