History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meacham v. Moore
59 Miss. 561
Miss.
1882
Check Treatment
Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Reluctant as we are to ’interfere with the exercise of the discretion of the courts whose proceedings are subject to-our revision, we are constrained to hold that, upon the presentation made by this record, the appellants .should have been permitted to supplement their evidence by introducing the evidence of their judgment in attachment, which was necessary to maintain the issue between them and the claimants. The omission to introduce it before they announced the closing of their evidence, from whatever cause that omission occurred, should not have been made fatal to their cause, but they should have been allowed to supply the omission whenever it was discovered.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Meacham v. Moore
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1882
Citation: 59 Miss. 561
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.