History
  • No items yet
midpage
M'Dowell v. Van Deusen
12 Johns. 356
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1815
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plea puis darrein continuance, was properly overruled. Admitting the truth of the matter set forth in it, it was not such as the defendant could avail himself of, to prevent the trial. It is a general principle, (1 Inst. 294. 2 Inst. 422.) that a judge cannot be excepted to, or challenged, for corrup-. tian ; but must be punished by indictment, or impeachment. If this plea could not be supported, it was agreed by the parties that judgment should be rendered for the plaintiffs. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: M'Dowell v. Van Deusen
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1815
Citation: 12 Johns. 356
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.