McWilliams, Leticia
PD-0042-15
| Tex. App. | Mar 27, 2015
Case Information

*1

*2

Leticia Philliams have been filed. Neither motion was filed. (Failure to pay supervisory fee, court costs, fine or restitution) The proof of the hearing on the motion to revoke probation in this cause was insufficient to show that the Probationer's failure to pay the supervisory fee (or court costs, fine or restitution) for maintenance of his probation was willful and intentional on the part of the Probationer. See Huenstler v. State, 436 S.W. 2d 363 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932).

Concerning the alleged failure of the Probationer to pay the supervisory fee (or court costs, fine or restitution) the evidence also was wholly insufficient to show the Probationer's ability to pay the alleged or recourses in the supervisory fee (or court costs, fine or restitution). See Sormany v. State, 486 S.W. 2d 324 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932); Matthews v. State, 433 S.W. 2d 943 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932).

Charging Instrument:

  • The Estate's Second Retition to Revoke Probated Sentence is not legal or valid.

Larcant County Texas Probation Department:

  • Probation was aware of my situation and circumstances. Probation testified in a court of law. They were aware I was ill, homeless and had no income. Physicians were not willful and intentional.

CJD 018569 Causc 1174887 03 − 23 − 2015

*3 Valigia Phylliams 3 What Please Review for Describatory Review Filed January 03-2015 CTD 0313563 Appellate Number 082-14-80142-C8 -Cart Of Criminal Appeals - Angel Sims and Cynthia Little Jobn

I pray this letter close not cause me anymore hurt, harm and danger. I am only defending myself.

Instead of the lexas Sivdical Syplen/Law Enforcement coming to my defense and protection, I have been punished, afforded and refoliated against. Due to the fact I have taught bach and continued to fight for my life and my rights. Due to the fact I have educated myself on the law to be able to protect myself. Due to the fact I reported and continue to report the crimes being committed against me.

  • Please review the information I submitted April 08, 2014 and dated April 08, 2014. As to why I requested an appeal, I received a copy of the information after it was filed from my appeal after my William H. Gill. May. I did not include a copy as it is already a part of the appeal. This information was reviewed by the State Court of Appeals and Supreme Judicial District. This information was filed with my notice of appeal dated April 08, 2014.

*4

CI * 0718569
Cover 1174887

Leticia Philliams

  • In that information- I asted as I repeatedly Heep ceting for the documents in my probation file to be revicwert The documents prove the siperdures do not belonato Ludge Robb Catalano. The documents I asted to have revieched were, the document placing me, in the MHMM Frazrism dated Sqwvory 19, 2011 (11e) date) and the Shaftes First (dated July 22, 2011) and Second (dated Tebnuary 04, 2014) Petition to Kevoke Roboted Sentence.
  • In that information- I explained ro Judae can siap in place of the presiding indae (illeqol I eaploined you Can not after legal banding documents (Mieqol) I also explained and pointed astabditional information (Racis).
  • In that information- I included a letter I wrote to Felipe Calzado (Irial attorney) dated March 25, 2014. This letter was in regards to my March 25, 2014 court date being reschedaled for the following week (April 04, 2014)
  • In that information- I explained what tach place on April 04, 2014. The hearing was held without warning and/or preparation.
  • I have been incarcerated since January 21, 2014. Even though the evidence is rocts - solid and unctenialble, I remain indaderoted. This completely scares me and why I feel I'm in danger. The Judicial System was designed and putil place to defend and protect the

*5