History
  • No items yet
midpage
McVeigh v. Messersmith
5 Cranch 316
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1837
Check Treatment

The Court

(Cranch, C. J.,

contra,) gave the instruction asked by Mr. Semmes, and refused that asked by Mr. Taylor.

Cranch, C.J., was of opinion that it ought to be left to the *317jury to say what was the extent and object of the plaintiff’s examination of the bacon, and whether he meant to rely upon that examination or upon the warranty.

Verdict for defendant.

Motion for new trial overruled.

Grange, C. J., contra.

Case Details

Case Name: McVeigh v. Messersmith
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Oct 15, 1837
Citation: 5 Cranch 316
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.