32:T53e,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"McNary v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 503 U.S. 1000","datePublished":"1992-04-22","legislationDate":"1992-04-22","citation":"McNary v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 503 U.S. 1000 (1992)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of the United States","description":"Read the full text of McNary v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc. (McNary v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 503 U.S. 1000 (1992)). This legal opinion, filed in 1992-04-22, from the Supreme Court of the United States discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/mcnary-v-haitian-centers-council--9115055"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/mcnary-v-haitian-centers-council--9115055","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, McNary v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., Supreme Court of the United States, McNary v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 503 U.S. 1000 (1992)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T4c5,

Lead Opinion

Application for stay of preliminary injunction, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the preliminary injunction entered on April 6, 1992, and clarified on April 15, 1992, by the United *1001States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, case No. 92 CV 1258, is stayed pending disposition of the appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the application.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice O’Connok, with whom Justice Souter joins,

dissenting.

I would deny the Government’s application to lift the injunction to the extent it applies to refugees who are and who remain screened in. Insofar as it prevents repatriation of those the Government determines may not remain, I would lift the injunction.