midpage

McNabb v. StateMcNabb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Feb 20, 1997
No. 95-865
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Allen
PER CURIAM.

Having considered the various arguments presented by the appellant in this direct criminal appeal, we affirm his convictions. We reject his argument pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), because the record is insufficient to show that peremptory challenges were exercised. See Ganyard v. State, 686 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McNabb v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 20, 1997
Citations: 689 So. 2d 371; 1997 WL 68048; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359; No. 95-865
Docket Number: No. 95-865
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In