History
  • No items yet
midpage
McMullin v. Bodine
247 Pa. 151
Pa.
1915
Check Treatment

Per Curiam,

A majority of the court are of opinion that the construction by Judge Evans of the contract on which the suit is based is correct and that the decree appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in his opinion.

Decree affirmed at the cost of the appellants.

Case Details

Case Name: McMullin v. Bodine
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 2, 1915
Citation: 247 Pa. 151
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 91
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    McMullin v. Bodine, 247 Pa. 151