History
  • No items yet
midpage
McMullen v. Brazelton
81 Ala. 442
Ala.
1886
Check Treatment
CLOPTON, J.-

— This is a proceeding in the Probate Court to make a final settlement of the administration of the estate of Margaret Brazelton, and distribution among her distributees. The record shows, that Susan Hannah, one of the distributees, had died after the death of the intestate, who was her mother. Her personal representative was not made a party to the proceeding, and her distributive share was divided between her husband and three children, for which decrees were rendered in their favor. From the organization of the Probate Court, it has been uniformly ruled, that a decree on the final settlement of an estate is erroneous, if any of the distributees die after the death of the intestate, and their personal representatives are not brought before the court. And advantage may be *443taken of the omission in this court, though no objection was made thereto in the Probate Court, the representative of the deceased distributee being an indispensable party. McComico v. Cannon, 25 Ala. 462; Boyett v. Kerr, 7 Ala. 9; Hall v. Andrews, 17 Ala. 40 ; Thomas v. Dumas, 30 Ala. 83.

Beversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: McMullen v. Brazelton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 15, 1886
Citation: 81 Ala. 442
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.