History
  • No items yet
midpage
McMullen v. Bank
51 S.E. 342
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
ITish, P. J.

1. “ In all applications for a new trial the opposite party shall he served with a copy of the rule nisi, unless such copy is waived.” Civil Code, § 5475; Smedley v. Williams, 112 Ga. 114.

2. Such service is essential though the application is to be heard''during the term at which the trial is had. The intimation to the contrary hi Baldwin v. Daniel, 69 Ga. 782, disapproved.

3. Where a rule nisi was granted on a motion for a new trial and ordered served, and the motion set to be heard at an adjourned term of the court at which it was made, to be held more than eighty days after the date of the rule, the court did not, at least, abuse its discretion in dismissing the motion for want of service, there being no excuse for failure of service, nor any evidence of waiver.

Judgment affirmed.

-All the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: McMullen v. Bank
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 16, 1905
Citation: 51 S.E. 342
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.