History
  • No items yet
midpage
McMillan v. . McMillan
122 N.C. 410
N.C.
1898
Check Treatment

The appellant dockets a certificate from the clerk stating the names of the parties to the case, and that a judgment and an appeal had been taken therein, and that the transcript of the record proper could not be sent up because the judge had the original papers to settle the "case on appeal," and had not sent them back, nor any "case settled." The appellant files his affidavit negativing laches and averring merits in his appeal. He is entitled to the certiorari asked for. Of course, if the original papers were in the clerk's office below, he should have docketed a transcript of the record proper and have moved upon that for a certiorari for the case on appeal. Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.C. 277; Critz v. Sparger, 121 N.C. 283. The appellant has docketed all he could get, and is in no laches.

Motion allowed.

Cited: Norwood v. Pratt, 124 N.C. 747; Slocumb v. Construction Co.,142 N.C. 350. *Page 254

(411)

Case Details

Case Name: McMillan v. . McMillan
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 29, 1898
Citation: 122 N.C. 410
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.