History
  • No items yet
midpage
McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.
89 So. 2d 349
Fla.
1956
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that -it is-manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need! no further argument; • -

*350It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to 'affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 31, 1956
Citation: 89 So. 2d 349
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.