| Mont. | Jan 11, 1892

Blake, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling the motion for a new trial and the judgment. The transcript does not contain a specification of errors or bill of exceptions, and the action of the court below which is complained of relates solely to a motion for a new trial and cannot be reviewed. The practice of this court has been uniform upon the subject. (Taylor v. Holter, 2 Mont. 476" court="Mont." date_filed="1876-01-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-holter-6637302?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6637302">2 Mont. 476; Bass v. Buker, 6 Mont. 442" court="Mont." date_filed="1887-01-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/bass-v-buker-6637702?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6637702">6 Mont. 442; *439Raymond v. Thexton, 7 Mont. 299" court="Mont." date_filed="1888-01-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/raymond-v-thexton-6637783?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6637783">7 Mont. 299, and eases cited.) It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the appeal be dismissed without prejudice.

Dismissed,

Harwood, J., and De Witt, J., concur.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.