McLean v. State, 732 So. 2d 1211

McLean v. State

732 So. 2d 1211

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1999

Check Treatment

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that failure to announce imposition of restitution at sentencing or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.