History
  • No items yet
midpage
McLean v. Plant Fruit Co.
167 So. 2d 332
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1964
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the appellee to dismiss.

After the filing of an amended complaint at law for damages for breach of contract, answer and counterclaim were filed. The Court entered a summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, but left pending the counterclaim. Under such circumstances the judgment dismissing the complaint is a partial summary judgment and therefore interlocutory, and not appeal-able within the meaning of Florida Statutes, § 59.2(1), F.S.A. and Florida Appellate Rule 3.2, subd. b, 31 F.S.A.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McLean v. Plant Fruit Co.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 23, 1964
Citation: 167 So. 2d 332
Docket Number: No. 5312
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.