20 Ga. App. 825 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1917
1. Where the accused in a criminal case exercises his right to make a statement to the jury, it is the duty of the presiding judge to instruct the jury substantially in the terms of the statute touching the prisoner’s statement. Where, however, the statement neither admits nor denies guilt, and the evidence for the State is uncontroverted and sufficient to warrant and uphold a conviction, the omission to instruct the jury substantially in terms of the statute touching the weight and credit to be given to the prisoner’s statement will not require a new trial. See Doster v. State, 93 Ga. 43 (4) (18 S. E. 997).
2. On the trial of one indicted for assault with intent to murder by the use of a deadly weapon, the burden is on the State to show (1) the
3. The further assignments of error are without substantial merit.
Judgment reversed.