History
  • No items yet
midpage
McLain v. State
21 S.W. 363
Tex. Crim. App.
1893
Check Treatment
DAVIDSON, Judge.

The Assistant Attorney-General, in an able brief and argument, has fully, and we think conclusively, met and answered the proposition relied on by the appellant, and involved in this appeal. He supports his argument by authorities that are unanswerable, as well as by former decisions of this court. We deem it unnecessary to enter upon a further discussion of the issues discussed, and therefore adopt the brief as the opinion of this court. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: McLain v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 22, 1893
Citation: 21 S.W. 363
Docket Number: No. 7.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.