McKinnon v. StateMcKinnon v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Mowbray
OPINION
Per Curiam:McKinnon was charged with having committed the crime of attempted murder. He was convicted of the crime of resisting a public officer while using a dangerous weapon. The issue on appeal is whether the crime of resisting a public officer is a lesser included offense of the crime of attempted murder.
Statute declares that a defendant may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included within the offense charged.
The crime of attempted murder is an attempt to unlawfully kill a human being with malice aforethought, either express or implied.
If the offense charged cannot be committed without necessarily committing another offense, the latter is a necessarily included offense. Lovell v. State, 92 Nev. 128, 546 P.2d 1301 (1976); Holland v. State, 82 Nev. 191, 414 P.2d 590 (1966); Lisby v. State, 82 Nev. 183, 414 P.2d 592 (1966). One need only read the mentioned statutes to know that a murder may be attempted without committing the offense of resisting a public officer. Consequently, we annul the conviction of McKinnon for the crime of resisting a public officer since it is not an offense necessarily included within the charge of attempted murder.
Reversed.
Mowbray, C. J., and Gunderson, Manoukian, and Bat-jer, JJ., and Young, D. J., 1 concur.