History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKinnie v. Tennessee
380 U.S. 449
SCOTUS
1965
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U. S. 306.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 326.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 318, 322, 327.

Case Details

Case Name: McKinnie v. Tennessee
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 5, 1965
Citation: 380 U.S. 449
Docket Number: 148
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.