History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKinney v. Wainwright
458 So. 2d 1149
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

McKinney’s conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon was affirmed by this court in McKinney v. State, 428 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). In a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this court, he claims that his appellate *1150counsel was ineffective because of the failure to assert on appeal that the firearm should have been suppressed pursuant to Section 901.151(6), Florida Statutes (1981). However, even assuming that the facts of this case justified raising such issue, appellate counsel would have been precluded from doing so inasmuch as such defense was not asserted at trial. The petition is therefore Denied.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McKinney v. Wainwright
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 26, 1984
Citation: 458 So. 2d 1149
Docket Number: No. BC-64
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.