History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis
84 So. 858
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1920
|
Check Treatment

The only assignment of error in this case is that the trial court erred in permitting the defendant's counsel to ask the defendant, while testifying as a witness: "Did you have a rating in Bradstreet and Dun?" The objection was general, specifying no grounds. Where this is the case, unless the matter is clearly not proper for any purpose, the ruling of the trial court will not be reversed. Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193,7 So. 149; Eason v. Isbell, 42 Ala. 456.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 10, 1920
Citation: 84 So. 858
Docket Number: 4 Div. 615.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.