McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company

161 N.Y. 638 | NY | 1900

These two appeals involve the same questions which were raised in the Kernochan Case (161 N.Y. 339), decided at the present term, and the judgments should be affirmed upon the opinion in that case, with costs.

All concur, except PARKER, Ch. J., not sitting, and O'BRIEN, J., dissenting.

Judgments affirmed.