midpage

McKenzie v. . AsheMcKenzie v. . Ashe

Superior Court of North Carolina
Sep 5, 1797
Reporters:
Before:
Per Curiam.

Whatever the rules of racing decide in such a case should be ‍‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‍the standard of decision now, the rule of law being that if he is entitled to the penalty by the rules of racing, he ‍‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‍is so by law.

The jury were divided, and a juror withdrawn.

See McKenzie v. Ashe, 3 N.C. 161; Hunter v. Bynum, ibid., 354.

NOTE BY REPORTER. — Upon inquiry ‍‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‍after the trial, several persons well experienced in racing gave it as their decided opinion that no accident whatever could exempt the defendant from ‍‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‍forfeiture in case of failure, unless he had expressly provided against it by his agreement.

NOTE BY ANNOTATOR. — All bets were made illegal. Laws ‍‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‍1810, ch. 796, now C. S., 2142, 2143; Gooch v. Faucett. 122 N.C. 270.

*1

Case Details

Case Name: McKenzie v. . Ashe
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1797
Citation: 2 N.C. 502
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
Log In